deception over shoot provider letter

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive!

I just found this, is it proof of deception on behalf of the BASC and WWT in collecting the data from shoot providers?

In the minutes of the 1st Steering Group meeting “BASC confirmed that they would conduct the shoot provider survey in addition to the BASC members survey as this was likely to get a higher response rate than WWT conducting the work.”

1st meeting higher response

To further prove the deception on shoot provides the letters to BASC members and shoot providers are different, I would put forward the allegation that this was to deceive the shoot providers.

The BASC letter to its members clearly states that this is a survey for the WWT and that they have been contracted by Defra. It does not say that BASC is subcontracted to the WWT to work on the contract.

BASC letter

Then in the Shoot Providers survey letter sent out to CLA members there is no mention about the WWT being involved. This is deception!

shoot letter

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s